Historians will scratch their heads in amazement, as 1990's videotapes are presented, showing every major American politician of both parties pontificating their clear understanding of the links between Saddam Hussein and major jihadist terror groups.  Just as these politicians repeatedly stated publicly their understanding of the obvious efforts of Saddam Hussein to develop more dread weapons, which, of course, he used repeatedly during his reign of terror.  Leaders of every major free nation followed President Clinton's lead after he announced official American policy to remove Saddam Hussein from power during the 1990's.  The American Thinker article (link below) outlines a mere sliver of the knowledge gleaned from 600,000 pages of documents, which point out the obvious connections. So much truth will be revealed, while the slanderers of America and President George W. Bush are alive to suffer the shame that historians will heap upon them. 

Just why the White House refuses to answer the relentless slander is a mystery. Perhaps the reality of daily, horrific briefings received by President Bush is sufficiently attention-getting, and to refute the ongoing BigMedia ("BM"), academia and Democrat party slanders would be a full-time job for the president, as he chooses to focus on his primary responsibility of preventing another atrocity that would render the 911 Atrocity a trip to Disneyland by comparison. 

But historians will have plenty of time to review the links between jihadist terror groups, and ponder the Weasel Axis of BigMedia, the Democrat party and the academic community's insistence on playing the role of Johnnie Cochran/Bob Shapiro as defense attorneys for "O-Jihadistan".  Why do these "defense attorneys" for Jihadistan insist on believing only the best as it relates to our avowed, would-be murderers, as they have consistently assigned the United States of America to a lower moral plane vis-a-vis our avowed, would-be murderers?  What will be the historic implications, as the Weasel Axis insists on energizing our beleagered jihadist foes, and as they undermine the dedicated efforts of the United States Military with words that are instantaneously broadcast overseas on a daily basis?  Just what is it that could conceivably motivate a United States Congressperson--with full and complete knowledge that his words instantaneously would be used to oxygenate our avowed would-be murderers--to consistently place blood-drenched murderers on a higher moral plane than the Civilized World's best and only hope in this Long War for Civilization?

Just as arch-rival NFL owners like the Giants and Jets interact in businesslike fashion in pursuit of the goal of the Super Bowl Lombardi Trophy, Jihadistan's major players have on an ongoing basis worked together in pursuit of their "Trophy," which in this case is the violent destruction of Western Civilization.  With a Seventh Century belief system overwhelmingly dedicated to murder and suicide, the jihadists on occasion engage in the sport of killing their fellow jihadists, distracting them somewhat from their relentless obsession with the "day job" of slaughtering us infidels. 

See link to Debra Baker's magnificent article in The American Thinker.  http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/04/saddam_and_alqaeda_1.html